You need Java to see this applet.
BROKEN BORDERS = THE DEATH OF WHITE AMERICA= THE KENNEDY LEGACY!
THE NUMBER ONE CHAMPION OF OPEN BORDERS WAS JOHN F. KENNEDY!
THE KENNEDY LEGACY HAS ALWAYS BEEN ANTI-AMERICAN! THEY WERE SHUNNED BY
MASSACHUSETTS' ELITE BECAUSE OF THEIR BOOTLEGGING FORTUNE! THIS BITTERNESS LEAD
THE KENNEDY FAMILY TO AN ALL OUT ASSAULT ON WHITE AMERICAN CULTURE. AFTER JOHN
KENNEDY WAS ASSASSINATED, HIS BROTHERS BOBBY AND TEDDY USED NATIONAL GUILT OVER
THE DEATH OF JOHN TO FORCE THROUGH THE SUICIDE PILL OF "THE HART-CELLER
IMMIGRATION REFORM ACT OF 1965." TODAY, 40 YEARS LATER, WHITE AMERICA STANDS ON THE
BRINK OF EXTINCTION. JOE KENNEDY, THE INFAMOUS BOOTLEGGER, HAS EXACTED HIS
REVENGE!
JOSEPH KENNEDY, BANKER TO AL CAPONE AND A
NOTORIOUS BOOTLEGGER HIMSELF, EMBEDDED INTO
HIS CHILDREN AN ALL OUT HATRED OF AMERICA!
However, if there is one man who can take the most credit for the 1965 act, it is John F. Kennedy. Kennedy seems to have inherited the resentment his father Joseph felt as an outsider in Boston’s WASP aristocracy. He voted against the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, and supported various refugee acts throughout the 1950s. In 1958 he wrote a book, A Nation of Immigrants, which attacked the quota system as illogical and without purpose, and the book served as Kennedy’s blueprint for immigration reform after he became president in 1960. In the summer of 1963, Kennedy sent Congress a proposal calling for the elimination of the national origins quota system. He wanted immigrants admitted on the basis of family reunification and needed skills, without regard to national origin. After his assassination in November, his brother Robert took up the cause of immigration reform, calling it JFK’s legacy. In the forward to a revised edition of A Nation of Immigrants, issued in 1964 to gain support for the new law, he wrote, “I know of no cause which President Kennedy championed more warmly than the improvement of our immigration policies.” Sold as a memorial to JFK, there was very little opposition to what became known as the Immigration Act of 1965.
TED KENNEDY'S LEGACY: ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
THE HARTY-CELLER IMMIGRATION ACT OF 1965  
AGAINST THE WISHES OF 70% OF AMERICANS!                   
AND AGAIN IN 2007 KENNEDY PUSHED TO LEGALIZE 20,000,000 ILLEGAL ALIENS! WHY?
                       WHY IS TED KENNEDY DETERMINED TO DESTROY WHITE AMERICA?
KENNEDY SAID IN 1965
"FIRST, OUR CITIES WILL NOT
BE FLOODED WITH A MILLION
IMMIGRANTS ANNUALLY!"
FACT: 3 MILLION ILLEGALS
ARRIVE EACH YEAR!

KENNEDY SAID:
SECONDLY, THE ETHNIC MIX
OF THIS NATION WILL NOT BE
UPSET!"
FACT: WHITE AMERICA WILL
BECOME A SMALL MINORITY
BY 2042!

KENNEDY SAID: "IT WILL NOT
CHANGE THE STANDARDS OF
ADMISSIONS!"
FACT: NOW, THERE ARE NO
STANDARDS. THE BORDERS
ARE WIDE OPEN!
THIS PICTURE SHOWS JOHN AND BOBBY KENNEDY ALONG SIDE MARTIN
LUTHER KING STANDING IN WHITE AMERICA'S GRAVEYARD!
THE GANG OF THREE!
JOHN,BOBBY,TEDDY
   THESE ARE THE TRAITORS WHO SIGNED AWAY AMERICA!
         THE BIGGEST LIES EVER TOLD TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!
         "This bill we sign today is not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions.
                                It will not restructure the shape of our daily lives."
Lyndon Baines Johnson at the signing of the Hart–Celler Immigration and Nationality Services Act, 1965
THIS 40 YEAR OLD STORY IS PROOF POSITIVE THAT THE KENNEDY FAMILY INTENDED TO PLACE A "NEGRO" IN THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT!
THE STAUS QUO WAS "WHITE AMERICA!"
WHAT WAS WRONG WITH WHITE AMERICA? WHITE AMERICA WON THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR, THE CIVIL WAR, THE SPANISH AMERICAN WAR,
WW1 AND 2! BY 2042 WHITE AMERICA WILL NOT EXIST! WHO VOTED TO DESTROY WHITE AMERICA? DID YOU?
1965 LABOR UNION AD AGAINST THE BILL!
THE DIRECT RESULTS OF DISOBEYING 70% OF THE PEOPLE!
1965 POLL SHOWING 57% OF AMERICANS OPPOSED THE
IMMIGRATION REFORM ACT OF 1965
WHAT WOULD THE 18% UNSURE THINK TODAY?
Counter
Author of bill
Michael Feighan
this picture shows communist jew manny celler standing beside
lyndon johnson!
celler was the driving force behind the destruction of white america!
also pictured is jew nicholas katzenbach(who covered up the
conspiracy of jfk's assassination!)
and jacob javits the jewish power broker who forced the bill through
the house!
jacob javits
manny celler
nicholas katzenbach
the jewish elite who destroyed
white america!
MARTIN LUTHER KING VERIFIES KENNEDY'S PREDICTION!
PRES. LYNDON JOHNSON
TEDDY AND BOBBY KENNEDY
HI SENATOR INOUYE
ARTHUR GOLDBERG
ARON ARONSON
HUBERT HUMPHREY
LADY BIRD JOHNSON
NOT PICTURED ARE MANNY CELLER, JACOB JAVITS AND NICHOLAS KATZENACH
THE JEWISH ELITE WHO FORCED THE BILL TROUGH!
"… the notion was created that somehow or another, 190 million
[the population of the U.S. in 1965] is going to be swallowed up.
None of us would want that, this bill does not seek to do it and the
bill could not do it." sen phil hart, "hart-celler" immigration bill
Secretary of Labor W. Willard Wirtz

"[S.500] would promote the admission
of individuals with qualifications and
occupations needed in the United
States without disturbing the domestic
employment situation."(Senate Part 1,
Book 1, p. 84)
Senator Claiborne Pell (R-RI)

"[S.500] sets the limit of how many people
we think are desirable to keep the mix I may
be wrong. Maybe there will be a huge surge
from India or a huge surge from Africa, but I
would tend to doubt it."(Senate Part 2, Book
1, pp. 561,563)
Senator Thomas H. Kuchel (R-CA)

"Under the proposed bill, the total number of
immigrants remains approximately the same
"(Senate Part 2, Book 1, p. 576)
Senator Daniel K. Inouye (D-HI)

"…while the national origins rule will be
eliminated in establishing quotas for foreign
countries, this does not mean that the bill would
permit a floodtide of new immigrants into this
country. As a matter of fact, the total number of
potential immigrants would not be changed very
much."(Senate Part 2, Book 3, p. 853)
THE OUTRAGEOUS LIES BOBBY KENNEDY
TOLD TO PASS HART-CELLER
THE JEWS CONSPIRED TO DESTROY CHRISTIAN AMERICA BY USING THE "COURTS," TO DESTROY CHRISTIANITY!
THE JEWS HAVE LITERALLY "RE-CREATED AMERICA IN A JEWISH RELIGIOUS IMAGE!
REMEMBER, JUDAISM IS NOT CHRISTIANITY! THEY VEHEMENTLY DETEST AND DENY CHRIST
MEET LEO PFEFFER, THE "JEWISH INTELLECT," WHO SINGLEHANDEDLY SWAYED THE U.S. SUPREME COURT TO
ABOLISH THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION IN AMERICA!
LEO PFEFFER WAS PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ELIMINATION OF PRAYER IN SCHOOLS!
THIS IMMORAL AND ATHEISTIC MAN FOUGHT TIRELESSLY TO ELIMINATE ALL MENTION OF GOD FROM AMERICA!
HE HAS SUCCEEDED! WHY DO CHRISTIANS ALLOW THIS?
What did the Cultural Revolution want?
Sex divorced from commitment and procreation. Consider
Leo Pfeffer’s words. On the one side of the culture war, according
to Pfeffer, were the Catholics, who “hope for an America in which,
if not all will be Catholics, all will adhere to Catholic values.”
These values are, according to Pfeffer, summarized in the following
list:
no divorce, no contraception, no abortion, no
obscene books or pictures, no homosexuality,
everybody worshipping God in his own way,
government solicitous of and helpful to religion,
and children and adults equally obedient to their
parents and lawful authority. (God, Caesar and
the Constitution, p.20)
It was an ACLU attorney, Leo Pfeffer,
who drafted the sloganeered “Wall of
Separation” opinion in Everson vs. the
Board of Education, 1947. This was the
ruling that launched the judicial system’
s de facto adoption of evolutionary
naturalism as the official U. S.
government religion.

And it was ACLU’s Hugo Black who
wrote both the Emerson decision and
its resulting diabolical decision in 1962
to abolish prayer in public schools
(Fisher, 1994 p.3).
                                           HOW AMERICA WAS STOLEN FROM EUROPEAN WHITE PEOPLE!
                                                      WE WERE TOLD AMERICAN WAS JUST AN "IDEA!"
                                 NOT A SOVEREIGN NATION WITH LANGUAGE, BORDERS AND CULTURE!
                                              ONCE WHITE PEOPLE ACCEPTED THE IDEA, THEN ANYONE COULD BE AN AMERICAN, INSTANTLY!
America was therefore the New World in this vital respect' that the State was purely an ideal, and nationality was identical only with acceptance of the ideal.
Senator Robert F. Kennedy (D-NY)

"In fact, the distribution of limited quota immigration can have no
significant effect on the ethnic balance of the United States. …
FACT: BY 2035 WHITE AMERICA WILL BE LESS THAN 50%. IN
1965 WHITE AMERICA WAS 95%. BY 2170 WHITE AMERICA
WILL LESS THAN 25% AND BY 2100 LESS THAN 10%

Total quota immigration is now 156,782; under the proposed bill, it
would rise to 164,482. Even if all these immigrants came from
Italy, for example, the net effect would be to increase the number
of Italo-Americans by one-tenth of 1 percent of our population this
year, and less as our population increases. Americans of Italian
extraction now constitute about 4 percent of our population; at
this rate, considering our own natural increase, it would take until
the year 2000 to increase that proportion to 6 percent.
FACT: 10-20 MILLION ILLEGALS FROM MEXICO ALONE HAVE
FLOODED AMERICA'S CITIES. THE ABOVE STATISTICS NEVER
CONTEMPLATED MASSIVE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.

Of course, S.500 would make no such radical change.
Immigration from any single country would be limited to 10
percent of the total-16,500-with the possible exception of the two
countries now sending more than that number, Great Britain and
Germany. But the extreme case should set to rest any fears that
this bill will change the ethnic, political, or economic makeup of
the United States.
FACT: ILLEGALS FROM LATIN AMERICA AND ASIA HAVE
TOPPED 30-50 MILLION. THEY HAVE COMPLETELY RE-SHAPED
THE POLITICS AND ECONOMIC MAKE-UP OF AMERICA'S
CITIES.
WHITE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ETNICALLY CLEANSED FROM ALL
MAJOR AMERICAN CITIES!

… [w]e bar immigration by those individuals who would compete
for jobs for which the supply of labor is adequate for the demand
FACT: ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AND HIB1 VISAS HAVE KILLED
MILLIONS OF AMERICAN JOBS!

… we bar immigration by individuals who have demonstrated that
they do not hold such allegiance [to our fundamental precepts of
political freedom and democratic government].
FACT: MUSLIM EXTREMISTS HAVE CREATED ENTIRE
CULTURES SUCH AS SHARIA LAW IN AMERICA!

… If it is true that those from northern Europe, as individuals, can
make greater contributions to this country than can others, then
this legislation will bring them here. If the legislation does not
bring them here, then the assumptions on which defenders of the
present system rely are wholly false.
FACT: H1B1 VISAS AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION HAS SHUT THE
DOOR TO EUROPEANS AND FLOODED AMERICA WITH
CHINESE AND INDIANS WHO WORK THE SAME JOB AT 1/3 THE
PRICE DESTROYING AMERICA'S COMMUNITIES AND TAX
BASE.

… [S.500] will facilitate the entry of skilled specialists … the level
of immigration now proposed is far less than that thought
'assimilable' by the most restrictionist Congress [1924] in our
history.
FACT: THE SKILLED SPECIALISTS ENTER ON H1B1 VISA FRON
INDIA, CHINA AND EVERYWHERE EXCEPT EUROPE! THEY DO
NOT ASSIMILATE. IN FACT AMERICA AHAS TO ADAPT TO
THEM. PRESS 1 FOR ENGLISH!

… As far as the quota system, it [S.500] increases it about 9,000
and as far as a practical matter, it increases it about 50,000. It is
not a large number."
FACT: 30-50 MILLION ILLEGALS ARE IN AMERICA TODAY!
THERE IS NO QUOTA BECAUSE EVERYONE WHO COMES
HERE STAYS HERE!
THERE IS NO BORDER SECURITY!
As Congress considers sweeping changes to
immigration law, nearly all the debate has centered
on the problem of illegal immigration. Little
discussed are the many concerns of legal
immigrants, the estimated 3 million to 4 million who
are, as it's so often been put --"already standing in
line."

The current system of legal immigration dates to
1965. It marked a radical break with previous policy
and has led to profound demographic changes in
America. But that's not how the law was seen when
it was passed -- at the height of the civil rights
movement, at a time when ideals of freedom,
democracy and equality had seized the nation.
Against this backdrop, the manner in which the
United States decided which foreigners could and
could not enter the country had become an
increasing embarrassment.

An Argument Based on Egalitarianism
"The law was just unbelievable in its clarity of
racism," says Stephen Klineberg, a sociologist at
Rice University. "It declared that Northern
Europeans are a superior subspecies of the white
race. The Nordics were superior to the Alpines, who
in turn were superior to the Mediterraneans, and all
of them were superior to the Jews and the Asians."

By the 1960s, Greeks, Poles, Portuguese and
Italians were complaining that immigration quotas
discriminated against them in favor of Western
Europeans. The Democratic Party took up their
cause, led by President John F. Kennedy. In a June
1963 speech to the American Committee on Italian
Migration, Kennedy called the system of quotas in
place back then " nearly intolerable."

After Kennedy's assassination, Congress passed,
and President Lyndon Johnson, signed the
Immigration and Naturalization Act. It leveled the
immigration playing field, giving a nearly equal shot
to newcomers from every corner of the world. The
ceremony was held at the foot of the symbolically
powerful Statue of Liberty. Yet President Johnson
tried to downplay the law's significance.

"This bill that we will sign today is not a
revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of
millions," Johnson said at the signing ceremony. "It
will not reshape the structure of our daily lives or
add importantly to either our wealth or our power."

Looking back, Johnson's statement is remarkable
because it proved so wrong. Why? Sociologist
Klineberg says the government's newfound sense of
egalitarianism only went so far. The central purpose
of the new immigration law was to reunite families.

Klineberg notes that in debating an overhaul of
immigration policy in the 1960s, many in Congress
had argued that little would change because the
measure gave preference to relatives of immigrants
already in America. Another provision gave
preference to professionals with skills in short
supply in the United States.

"Congress was saying in its debates, 'We need to
open the door for some more British doctors, some
more German engineers,'" Klineberg says. "It never
occurred to anyone, literally, that there were going
to be African doctors, Indian engineers, Chinese
computer programmers who'd be able, for the first
time in the 20th century, to immigrate to America."

Predictions Based on Ignorance?
In fact, expert after expert testified before Congress
that little would change. Secretary of State Dean
Rusk repeatedly stressed that the number of new
immigrants coming to the United States was not
expected to skyrocket. What was really at stake,
Rusk argued, was the principle of a more open
immigration policy.

When asked about the number of people from India
who would want to immigrate to the United States,
Rusk told the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration
and Naturalization: "The present estimate, based
upon the best information we can get, is that there
might be, say, 8,000 immigrants from India in the
next five years. In other words, I don't think we have
a particular picture of a world situation where
everybody is just straining to move to the Unites
States."

Historian Otis Graham, professor emeritus of the
University of California at Santa Barbara, says that
when he first started studying the 1965 immigration
law, he assumed that politicians at the time had lied
about the law's potential consequences in order to
get it passed. But he says he has since changed his
mind.

"In the research of my students, and in the research
I've been able to do," Graham says, "so many
lobbyists that followed this issue, so many
labor-union executives that followed this issue, so
many church people -- so many of those involved
said the same thing. So you find ignorance
three-feet deep. Maybe ignorance is the answer."

Karen Narasaki, who heads the Asian American
Justice Center, finds the 1965 immigration overhaul
all the more extraordinary because there's evidence
it was not popular with the public.

"It was not what people were marching in the
streets over in the 1960s," she says. "It was really a
group of political elites who were trying to look into
the future. And again, it was the issue of, 'Are we
going to be true to what we say our values are?'"

In 1965, the political elite on Capitol Hill may not have
predicted a mass increase in immigration. But
Marian Smith, the historian for Customs and
Immigration Services, showed me a small agency
booklet from 1966 that certainly did. It explains how
each provision in the new law would lead to a rapid
increase in applications and a big jump in workload
-- more and more so as word trickled out to those
newly eligible to come. Smith says a lifetime of
immigration backlogs had built up among America's
foreign-born minorities. These immigrants would
petition for relatives to come to the United States,
and those relatives in turn would petition for other
family members. Demand from post-colonial
countries in Asia and Africa, she notes, jumped after
World War II.

The Families Factor
The influx of refugees and of millions of illegal
immigrants over the last several decades have
certainly contributed to the United States' profound
demographic transformation. But the chief driver of
this change remains the system of family-based
immigration put in place in 1965. Over time, in a
process critics call "chain migration," entire
families have re-established themselves in the
United States. Historian Otis Graham thinks the
policy has been a terrible mistake.

"Family reunification puts the decision of who
comes to America in the hands of foreigners,"
Graham says. "Those decisions are out of the hand
of the Congress -- they just set up a formula and its
kinship. Frankly, it could be called nepotism."

In fact, President Kennedy's original proposal made
skills-based immigration the priority. But Graham
says a broad lobby pushed for the greater emphasis
on families. It included churches, ethnic groups
whose members had family in the old country, and
the AFL-CIO. Graham says the union worried about
competition from too many highly skilled
newcomers.

But the Asian American Justice Center's Narasaki
thinks the family focus makes sense. She notes that
in the Asian community, extended families often
function as a close-knit unit. Parents will help raise
children, while siblings will pool their money to buy
homes and businesses together and to help finance
college for the younger generation.

"A family is very important not just to the social and
emotional well-being, but also to the economic
well-being of these communities," she says.

At a recent naturalization ceremony, 32 immigrants
gathered for their oath of citizenship in the ornate
rotunda of Washington's National Archives. Of them,
three were from Western Europe. The rest were
overwhelmingly from Africa, Latin America and Asia.

Later, at a basement reception, the new citizens
posed for pictures, holding tiny American flags and a
gift bag that included a refrigerator magnet of the
U.S. Constitution and an AT&T prepaid calling card.
One older woman, dressed in her Sunday best, with
a broad-brimmed hat, introduced herself as Hannah
Ndubuisi. She is from Nigeria, and her name means
"life is first." Ndubisi was sponsored by her U.S.
citizen son, Samuel.

"Everybody in the world -- I don't know if you know
this -- wants to come to the United States of
America," she says. "All you need to do is go to the
embassy, any embassy, and see long, long lines of
people who want to come here."

In fact, Ndubisi has a long line of relatives still in
Nigeria who'd love to come. It's the same with
another brand-new citizen at the reception, Emad Ali
from Sudan.
"I have my parents, I have sisters, I have brothers,"
Ali says. "I'm going to apply for them to come here
soon -- definitely. I hope they will be here soon."

It may not be soon at all, though. The immigration
system set up specifically to reunite families is so
overwhelmed with applicants, that relatives who
wait their turn must endure being divided for years.
WAS JFK KILLED TO
PASS IMMIGRATION
REFORM?
HIS DEATH WAS USED TO
FORCE THE BILL THROUGH
CONGRESS!
KATZENBACK'S JFK
ASSASSINATION COVER-UP!
THE SMOKING GUN
STATEMENT:
"The public must be satisfied
that Oswald was the assassin;
that he had no confederates
who are still at large; and that
evidence was such that he
would have been convicted at
trial...Speculation about
Oswald's motivation ought to
be cut off...Unfortunately the
facts on Oswald seem about
too pat—too obvious (Marxist,
Cuba, Russian wife, etc.)...We
need something to head off
public speculation or
Congressional hearings of the
wrong sort."
THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY TO CHANGE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION!
MYSTERY SOLVED AT LAST!
ENIGMA WRAPPED INSIDE A MYSTERY NO LONGER!
PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY WAS KILLED TO PASS "CIVIL RIGHTS" AND
"IMMIGRATION REFORM!"
THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK WAS REALLY THE ASSASSINATION OF WHITE AMERICA!
For 40 years America has struggled with the question about why President John F. Kennedy
was assassinated. Movies, books, television and radio shows have all made fortunes putting
forth vague, unsubstantiated conspiracy theories. All of these theories eventually lead to the
same dead end, they couldn't explain WHY HE WAS KILLED?

The theories ranged from Oliver Stone's premise that JFK refused the Viet Nam War all the
way to the theory that his executive order would have ended the Federal reserve. The truth is
that JFK wasn't opposed to war, seeing that he weas a decorated war hero himself and he
had just threatened the Russians with a NUCLEAR war over Cuban missles. His executive
order number 11110 dealt strictly with silver and silver certificates, but said nothing about
ending the Fed. Today, after 40 years the "WHY," can now be seen clearly. JFK was killed to
insure passage of the 1964 "Civil Rights Law," and the 1965 "Hart-Celler Immigration
Reform," laws!

The "Hart-Celler," immigration bill literally opened America's borders to the third world,
while STOPPING immigration from Europe. Since 1975, 75% of immigration has been from
the undeveloped 3rd world. The SUICIDE PILL OF CHAIN MIGRATION, where relatives and
children born on American soil gain instant status has swallowed up White America, and by
2035 White America will be a minority in their own nation. This is hardly what the founding
Fathers had in mind. The "Civil Rights," bill then gave "EQUAL RIGHTS," to the illegal invaders.

Under Hart-Celler, Immigration to America DOUBLED from 1965 to 1970 and then DOUBLED
again from 1970 to 1990! The long term effects of this massive immigration has been an
overwhelming of American cities and states. The political implications were visible this past
election when minority voteers were directly responsible for electing Barak Hussein Obama
President.

National public radio admits "Hart-Celler," killed white America.

It is no surprise to learn that 75% of Americans opposed both of those bills.
WHY? Because in 1962 America was 95% WHITE, SAFE, PROSPEROUS AND LITERALLY
RULED THE WORLD! There was no chance of passing either of those laws. Every time they
were brought up in Congress massive opposition from the public stopped them cold.

No matter what excuses were put forth, they could not explain to White Americans who had
just won World War 2 why "AMERICA WAS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AS WE WERE!"

Politicians looked stupid standing on the floor of Congress and telling the richest, strongest
people on earth that they were so insufficient that the only way to "HEAL" ourselves was to
commit national racial suicide! NOBODY BELIEVED IT!

Something was needed. Something had to be done to soften the American people up.
Something so shocking and devastating had to take place that the American people would
be distracted while the two suicide pills were forced down America's throat.

That something was the deliberate murder of the elected president of the United States. JFK
was Killed at exactly 18:30 UTC, November 22, 1963. While America grieved and mourned,
Lyndon Johnson, Bobby Kennedy and Teddy Kennedy took to Congress and pushed as JFK's
Legacy "FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS LAW OF 1964," and "THE HART-CELLER IMMIGRATION BILL,"
of 1965.

To insure Kennedy support, Bobby was promised the Presidency. As Attorney general he
literally "INVADED," America's southern States and created hatred amongst the races. The
result, Bobby was headed for the White House and Teddy was elected to the Senate.

Both pushed the Civil Rights Law and then Immigration Reform as JFK's legacy. BOTH LIED!
Teddy made the following statements on the floor of Congress: "1. Our cities will not be
flooded with a million illegals annually, 2. The ethnic mix of the nation will not be upset and 3.
It will not change the standards of admission!" Today we can see that those were deliberate
lies, because that is exactly what has happened.

Simon Rosenberg founder of the new democratic Network called  the Act "the most
important piece of legislation that no one’s ever heard of," and that it "set America on a very
different demographic course than the previous 300 years."

It seemed the deal they struck with the devil would pay off. But, the enemy had other plans.
In 1968 BEFORE the laws had done their damage, Bobby was assassinated in a hotel pantry
while leaving a Los Angeles hotel. Teddy was caught in a "HONEY TRAP," having
impregnated a young girl named Mary Jo Kapekne. Facing political suicide he drove his car
into a canal and watched the girl drown. He was forced to call his "friends," who covered up
his crimes and saved his political career. His future compliance was then assured!

Now we know WHY JFK was murdered. The next question is by WHOM?